The old two-model article got the verdict backward. ScrimmageLab's empty-calories file gives Jonathan Taylor a 22.9 score, below the RB average of 27.7, while the fatigue file still flags a real workload risk.
ScrimmageLab's 2025 cumulative fatigue file flags a running back efficiency dip around 213 carries. The rewrite keeps the signal, drops fake certainty, and names the backs who need context checks.
ScrimmageLab's 2022-2024 pressure profile gives Josh Allen a 96.0 resilience score, first among 57 qualifying quarterbacks, but the fantasy lesson is about floor more than mythology.
ScrimmageLab's 2005-2021 draft ROI file puts Pittsburgh first at 0.93 and Cleveland last at 0.29, but the real lesson is how quickly the cost curve punishes missed premium picks.
ScrimmageLab tested 1090 qualifying players against top-10 and bottom-10 defenses and found wide receivers had the smallest average matchup gap at 24.4%.
Carolina's real record trail is 24-60 from 2020-2024, and the model still projects only 3.2 wins for 2026 even after defensive spending.
In ScrimmageLab's 2015-2025 year-over-year sample, WR target share autocorrelates at 0.649 while touchdown rate fails the stability test. Volume is the signal; TDs are the smoke.
ScrimmageLab's 2022-2024 coach-DNA file covers all 32 teams and shows Cincinnati at 61.3% early-down passing in close games, Detroit at 32.5% on fourth downs, and Philadelphia at 89.3% shotgun rate. Treat style as a fantasy shortcut, not a guarantee.
ScrimmageLab's injury-replacement file covers 524 events since 2018. Replacements averaged useful boosts, but only 21.2% cleared the fantasy-viable line.
ScrimmageLab's contract-year file found 1057 paired seasons and a -0.38 PPG contract-year change, not a breakout bump. The real draft tax is paying for a story the data does not support.
Get the latest analyses, model updates, and fantasy insights delivered to your inbox. No spam — just data.